Bukowski scholars, take note
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a89d/5a89d09fe1dd28438ce4fb49db46a67a54bf38fc" alt=""
From the article, we also learn that:
"There's an irony to it," she [Linda Lee Bukowski] said from her San Pedro home. "Bukowski was known to be a garrulous old S.O.B."I'm not sure that it's actually ironic. Maybe ironic in the strict Alanis Morissette sense of the word. But I wouldn't be willing to bet that either of the literary giants mentioned in the article was never referred to as a "crusty old fuck" in his day. [Note the suspect double-negative here: I like to keep my bases covered by introducing an element of confusion.]
What I mean is that neither man was self-consciously literary. On the contrary, like ol' Charles Bukowski, they demonstrated a taste for the vernacular, for the dirty joke, for the entertaining story. "Old" may be the only element of the epithet that bears quibbling with -- Bukowski had at least 20 years on the older of the two others. Probably from all that clean living.
Here's what I like about the idea of the Huntington Library being home to Bukowski's personal papers: it will become a magnet for Bukowski scholars. Bukowski scholars. Bukowski scholars work with a variety of legitimized topics: big steamy beer shits; systems for picking the horses at Santa Anita; dive bars downtown; manual typewriters and so on.
Bukowski scholars. Makes me smile.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07624/07624d414c1c061f43d60eeb2ae9a584a6d6a77c" alt=""
What makes me smile even more is the effect of making the Huntington Library a magnet for Bukowski scholars: they'll want those tenure-track jobs on the faculty of Caltech. Caltechnicality as the decal on the window of my decrepit Opel stationwagon used to read.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bd31/2bd317803bca64d6731f9b636247080593799111" alt=""
Of course, scholars who take on the literary output of a particular writer don't really assume much of the other baggage. Burroughs scholars aren't themselves junkies; Hemingway scholars may not even know how to fish; and Pynchon scholars no doubt have a higher rate of output than their subject.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bb50/9bb50c9f89c3a2e11197ec2897b707a2988ce04c" alt=""
I've curbed my enthusiasm here, but still I can see new offerings in the staid old Caltech catalog:
En 151: Garrulous Old S.O.B.s of 20th Century American LettersCaltech's a small place: there shouldn't be much of a waitlist for these courses.
En 152: Poetics of Midcentury Crusty Old Farts
1 Comments:
Don't know if you can answer this question or not but its worth a shot...I have a signed copy of Crucifix in a Deathhand, an original copy. The book itself should be the most valuable of all his work, as it is painstakingly made with brillance, and beauty, the artwork, the pages, everything about it is lovely. a signed copy I thought would be priceless. Upon further research, I saw that copies of other books of his, some from the 90's, were valued at more than $2,000, unsigned. They were also, and obviously, not originals. I found a copy of Crucifix, signed by Bukowski the day after mine, and it was on ebay for $700. Why is that?? It makes no sense to me, at all! If you could email me at Birdgehrlofswansea@gmail.com with any information as to why or how, I'd greatly appreciate it! I never wanted to sell my copy, but at this point in my life, I may unfortunately have to. But I can't part with it under conditions like these, lol, unless I know why, or unless the value of mine is actually worth more than 700 bucks. Thank you for your time
Post a Comment
<< Home